In cases of negligence or misconduct, who is considered fully liable?

In cases of negligence or misconduct, accountable officers and contractors are considered fully liable because they have specific responsibilities and duties related to property accountability and management. Accountable officers are typically responsible for the oversight and safeguarding of property and resources within an organization. They are tasked with ensuring compliance with policies and regulations and for maintaining accurate records of property management. When they fail to meet these responsibilities due to negligence or misconduct, they hold a significant level of liability.

Similarly, contractors who are engaged to manage or oversee property on behalf of an organization also assume certain liabilities. They are expected to perform their duties in accordance with defined standards and legal expectations. If they neglect their responsibilities or engage in misconduct while fulfilling their contractual obligations, they can also be held fully liable for any resulting issues.

In contrast, the other options focus on specific groups that do not encompass the full scope of accountability required in these situations. Leadership positions, long-term employees, or external auditors may have roles that contribute to the overall accountability framework, but they do not hold the same level of direct responsibility for property management and the associated liabilities as accountable officers and contractors do. This distinction is crucial in understanding the framework of responsibility in cases of negligence or misconduct.